Posted by NYC Immigration Attorney Norka M. Schell
Days before the Senate is
expected to pass a sweeping immigration reform bill, bi-national same-sex
married couples have cause to celebrate after the Supreme Court’s decision
striking down the Defense of Marriage Act appeared to offer them equal treatment
under U.S. immigration law.
Before today’s decision,
an American was prohibited under DOMA from sponsoring a same-sex foreign
national spouse for a green card. Practically, that meant that an American who
married someone of the same sex from a different country was unable to bring
their spouse to live legally in the United States as a heterosexual married
person could.
But the court’s decision
to strike down DOMA means those marriages must be recognized for immigration
purposes, a relief for some backers of the comprehensive immigration reform
bill -- which does not include language addressing immigration rights for
same-sex couples despite heavy lobbying from LGBT groups.
In a statement Wednesday,
Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano pledged to ensure that the
ruling extends in practice to same-sex binational couples.
"Working with our
federal partners, including the Department of Justice, we will implement
today's decision so that all married couples will be treated equally and fairly
in the administration of our immigration laws," she said.
LGBT rights groups had
vowed to keep pushing for the inclusion of the language on the Senate floor if
DOMA was upheld, pressure that could have frayed the delicate bipartisan
coalition that has shepherded the immigration legislation through the Senate.
One of those groups'
Senate champions, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., confirmed Wednesday that he would
not seek a floor vote on his amendment to the Senate immigration bill that
would have recognized the marriages of same-sex couples under immigration
law.
A visibly emotional Leahy
withheld that amendment during his panel’s mark-up of the immigration bill in
May, citing GOP threats to spike the overall legislation if the measure was
included.
“I do not believe we
should ask Americans to choose between the love of their life and love of their
country,” Leahy said at the time. “Discriminating against a segment of
Americans because of who they love is a travesty and it is ripping many
American families apart.”
During the June debate
over the bill, key Republicans have continued to call the Leahy language a
poison pill.
“If this bill has in it something that gives gay couples
immigration rights and so forth, it kills the bill. I'm done,” Sen. Marco Rubio
of Florida, a key GOP supporter of the bill, said earlier this month. Author of this article, Carrie Dann, NBC News.
No comments:
Post a Comment